Posted by bryanswan | December 29th, 2015
Following up to our post from before Christmas, we just posted part two of our December 2015 data publish, adding an additional 543 waterfalls to the database; 278 more entries in the Canadian province of British Columbia, and in the United States, additions in the following states: Washington (203), Oregon (37), California (12), Montana (8), and Colorado (6). Through this process we identified a problem with our data import system that was resulting in duplicate entries in certain circumstances. While we’re fairly certain we cleaned out all of the duplicates from the recent imports, there may be some still floating around out there that we haven’t caught yet. If you do see any entries which appear to be duplicates (mapped twice, for example), please let us know – this shouldn’t be an issue going forward.
With this recent data publish, our database currently sits at over 17,000 waterfalls and counting. Keep in mind that our primary focus thus far has been to get all of our data for the United States online first, so given that this only accounts for a small fraction of the globe, that’s a pretty astounding number. When we finally get around to adding heavyweight countries like Norway, France, Australia, Switzerland, New Zealand, Japan, let alone finishing up the rest of Canada (Ontario and Quebec alone should add at LEAST another 1,500 entries), we’ll be looking at a staggering number of waterfalls inventoried! Hopefully in 2016 we’re able to grow the data much further and faster than we were able to this year.
Posted by bryanswan | December 21st, 2015
In a completely unexpected turn of events, we’re really bad at getting new data up on the website. Shocking, I know. Well, better late than never I suppose? Having become abundantly obvious to us a few weeks ago that it had been nearly a year since we’d posted any new data to the database, we decided it was time to re-evaluate our strategy and see if maybe we can do things in a slightly more efficient way. So, rather than waiting until we have fully proofed our internal data sets and ensured they are as complete as possible, we are going to try to post whatever we have ready to go as soon as it’s possible (within our not terribly flexible schedules at least).
That said, we’ve just posted data for several regions of North America: in the United States we’ve added nearly the complete data sets for Maine (238 entries) and Georgia (152 entries so far – more to be added later), as well as a smattering of additional falls in Minnesota, New Mexico, North and South Carolina, and Ohio. In Canada, we’ve added the very limited data sets we had for Yukon, Nunavut, and the Northwest Territories, as well as the full data set for Saskatchewan (yes, there are in fact waterfalls in Saskatchewan), as well as a solitary entry in New Brunswick which shares the border with Maine.
We will probably try to get one more publish done before the end of the year, with possibly the rest of the Georgia and Maine data, as well as additions to Washington, Oregon, British Columbia, and more of the mountainous western states, and hopefully at least one full set for one of the remaining US States which hasn’t been published yet.
Posted by bryanswan | January 11th, 2015
Probably the most glaring issue with our website has been the ability to easily browse the contents of the database to find any given waterfall. For years we had been meaning to address the issue but simply never got a chance to for whatever reason (and many of them not very good at that). Well we’ve finally been able to do something about it, and today marks the launch of our new Mapping tool.
With this new system you will be able to browse the entire contents of our database in a Google Maps window. To start, this is limited only to browsing by any given country – and in certain cases States or Provinces within that country (currently this only applies to the United States, Canada, and Australia, but will expand in the future). In the future we plan on adding the ability to display search results and Top 100 lists on the map, and expand on the flexibility of the system further.
Check it out for yourself – click here (or the image above) to launch the Map.
Posted by bryanswan | December 20th, 2014
We haven’t exactly been very vigilant about posting updates here over the last six months, but long time readers may have come to expect that sort of inconsistency. Usually that that means is we’ve been working tirelessly…well, maybe almost tirelessly… on getting more content prepared and rolling out new features for the website. So, in honor of the holiday season, here’s our present to our readers:
Complete data for the following States has been posted:
Arkansas (454 waterfalls)
Kentucky (101 waterfalls)
Missouri (16 waterfalls)
North Carolina (651 waterfalls)
Oklahoma (36 waterfalls)
Texas (94 waterfalls)
With these updates we now have data for 36 out of 50 states, and brings our grand total of waterfalls in the United States (so far) up to a whopping 10,919, and when all is said and done we expect that number to climb closer to 14,000 (and of course, it will continue to grow as we find and inventory more and more waterfalls).
In addition to the United States coverage, we also added data for 492 waterfalls in Iceland, about eighty of which we had the opportunity to survey back in August. To date we’ve posted reports on about half of those, and the remaining reports (as well as pictures) will be posted when we can get around to them.
Lastly, in addition to continuously adding more data, we’ve been working on overhauling some of the systems that power the website. We’ve got some much needed changes in the pipeline that we hope to have launched by the end of the year. If you follow us on Facebook (which you should), you may have seen mention of a new mapping system coming down the line. Well it’s getting close. I can’t say exactly when it will be ready, because there are a couple other dependencies that have to be finished first. But it’s coming. Soon. I’m not going to spoil the surprise, but I will say that it will make navigating and searching for waterfalls in the database infinitely easier right off the bat, and will allow us some much needed expansion capability in the future as well. Stay tuned.
Posted by bryanswan | June 13th, 2014
The upper basin of the Iguacu River in Brazil has seen prolonged heavy rain recently, which has caused the Iguacu River to swell to previously unheard of proportions. Iguacu Falls, which lies on the border between Brazil and Argentina, is currently in a spate that has absolutely shattered its previous record levels. In 1992 the river reached a flow of 36,000 cubic meters – or 1.27 million cubic feet – of water flowing over the falls every second. Today the river is said to have peaked out at 46,800 cubic meters – or 1.65 million cubic feet – of water every second. That’s approximately 3 times as much water as the average flow of the Mississippi River, and 5 times as much as the St. Lawrence River below Lake Ontario. In fact, that’s more water every second than the average volume of any other river on earth except for the Amazon! That’s so much water that the lower tier of the 269 foot tall falls was almost entirely submerged from the water backing up in the gorge.
See for yourself: